Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Sequester of Fools

  1. #1
    Senior Member DiabloViejo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    11,143

    Sequester of Fools

    OP-ED COLUMNIST

    Sequester of Fools

    By PAUL KRUGMAN

    Published: February 21, 2013

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/op...-of-fools.html

    Krugman_New-articleInline-v2.jpg


    They’re baaack! Just about two years ago, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, the co-chairmen of the late unlamented debt commission, warned us to expect a terrible fiscal crisis within, um, two years unless we adopted their plan. The crisis hasn’t materialized, but they’re nonetheless back with a new version. And, in case you’re interested, after last year’s election — in which American voters made it clear that they want to preserve the social safety net while raising taxes on the rich — the famous fomenters of fiscal fear have moved to the right, calling for even less revenue and even more spending cuts.

    But you aren’t interested, are you? Almost nobody is. Messrs. Bowles and Simpson had their moment — the annus horribilis of 2011, when Washington was in thrall to deficit scolds insisting that, in the face of record-high long-term unemployment and record-low borrowing costs, we forget about jobs and concentrate exclusively on a “grand bargain” that would supposedly (not actually) settle budget disputes for ever after.

    That moment has now passed; even Mr. Bowles concedes that the search for a grand bargain is on “life support.” Let’s convene a death panel! But the legacy of that year of living foolishly lives on, in the form of the “sequester,” one of the worst policy ideas in our nation’s history.

    Here’s how it happened: Republicans engaged in unprecedented hostage-taking, threatening to push America into default by refusing to raise the debt ceiling unless President Obama agreed to a grand bargain on their terms. Mr. Obama, alas, didn’t stand firm; instead, he tried to buy time. And, somehow, both sides decided that the way to buy time was to create a fiscal doomsday machine that would inflict gratuitous damage on the nation through spending cuts unless a grand bargain was reached. Sure enough, there is no bargain, and the doomsday machine will go off at the end of next week.

    There’s a silly debate under way about who bears responsibility for the sequester, which almost everyone now agrees was a really bad idea. The truth is that Republicans and Democrats alike signed on to this idea. But that’s water under the bridge. The question we should be asking is who has a better plan for dealing with the aftermath of that shared mistake.

    The right policy would be to forget about the whole thing. America doesn’t face a deficit crisis, nor will it face such a crisis anytime soon. Meanwhile, we have a weak economy that is recovering far too slowly from the recession that began in 2007. And, as Janet Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, recently emphasized, one main reason for the sluggish recovery is that government spending has been far weaker in this business cycle than in the past. We should be spending more, not less, until we’re close to full employment; the sequester is exactly what the doctor didn’t order.

    Unfortunately, neither party is proposing that we just call the whole thing off. But the proposal from Senate Democrats at least moves in the right direction, replacing the most destructive spending cuts — those that fall on the most vulnerable members of our society — with tax increases on the wealthy, and delaying austerity in a way that would protect the economy.

    House Republicans, on the other hand, want to take everything that’s bad about the sequester and make it worse: canceling cuts in the defense budget, which actually does contain a lot of waste and fraud, and replacing them with severe cuts in aid to America’s neediest. This would hit the nation with a double whammy, reducing growth while increasing injustice.

    As always, many pundits want to portray the deadlock over the sequester as a situation in which both sides are at fault, and in which both should give ground. But there’s really no symmetry here. A middle-of-the-road solution would presumably involve a mix of spending cuts and tax increases; well, that’s what Democrats are proposing, while Republicans are adamant that it should be cuts only. And given that the proposed Republican cuts would be even worse than those set to happen under the sequester, it’s hard to see why Democrats should negotiate at all, as opposed to just letting the sequester happen.

    So here we go. The good news is that compared with our last two self-inflicted crises, the sequester is relatively small potatoes. A failure to raise the debt ceiling would have threatened chaos in world financial markets; failure to reach a deal on the so-called fiscal cliff would have led to so much sudden austerity that we might well have plunged back into recession. The sequester, by contrast, will probably cost “only” around 700,000 jobs.

    But the looming mess remains a monument to the power of truly bad ideas — ideas that the entire Washington establishment was somehow convinced represented deep wisdom.



    A version of this op-ed appeared in print on February 22, 2013, on page A23 of the New York edition with the headline: Sequester Of Fools.





    There is no stupider creature on earth than a poor Republican. Such a person would stand in line to be sodomized and then thank their assailant afterward.


  2. #2
    Senior Member Sev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    State of Franklin.
    Posts
    9,583
    85 billion is nothing but a rounding error in the 3.3 trillion that is being spent.

    Democrats are now worried that it wont be a disaster.

    Remember those Y2K nutters.



    There isn't anything wrong with America that liberal ideology, properly applied by government experts, can't make worse.

  3. #3
    Senior Member DiabloViejo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    11,143
    We will soon see.
    There is no stupider creature on earth than a poor Republican. Such a person would stand in line to be sodomized and then thank their assailant afterward.


  4. #4
    The Department of Homeland Security is releasing thousands of illegal immigrants held in jails, with officials pinning blame on budget cuts. How disingenuous is that??? Law enforcement officials are saying this could endanger the public.
    "I'm shootin' pool Fats ... when I miss you can shoot."

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ballarat Australia
    Posts
    5,711
    We are all watching down here. Haz anyone ever thort about assisted suicide for theusofa -- i think it haz been allowed for by the foundling farters.

    IDEA.
    Build a giant replica of the the alamo, for the rich -- and lock the poor and criminals and wetbax outside.
    mac.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ballarat Australia
    Posts
    5,711
    "........And, as Janet Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, recently emphasized, one main reason for the sluggish recovery is that government spending has been far weaker in this business cycle than in the past. We should be spending more, not less, until we’re close to full employment; the sequester is exactly what the doctor didn’t order......"

    HAAAHHHHHAAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
    THE USOFA HAZ NEVER EVER HAD CLOSE TO FULL EMPLOYMENT -- UNEMPLOYMENT HAZ NEVER BEEN LESS THAN 10%. DREAM ON -- OR LIE ON AKTUALLY.
    MAC.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    5,102
    Quote Originally Posted by Nine ... corner View Post
    The Department of Homeland Security is releasing thousands of illegal immigrants held in jails, with officials pinning blame on budget cuts. How disingenuous is that??? Law enforcement officials are saying this could endanger the public.
    And it should endanger us. This sucks! Sounds like ducking on governmental responsibilities to me. Let the old timers out who are in prison for simple marijuanna. They are the oppressed and unjustly inprisoned!
    "If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room!"

  8. #8
    Senior Member Sev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    State of Franklin.
    Posts
    9,583
    Quote Originally Posted by cushioncrawler View Post
    We are all watching down here. Haz anyone ever thort about assisted suicide for theusofa -- i think it haz been allowed for by the foundling farters.

    IDEA.
    Build a giant replica of the the alamo, for the rich -- and lock the poor and criminals and wetbax outside.
    mac.
    Rome is burning Mac. Of that there is no doubt.
    They keep telling us its for the children. So it must be ok.



    There isn't anything wrong with America that liberal ideology, properly applied by government experts, can't make worse.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ballarat Australia
    Posts
    5,711
    Sev -- Austerity iz hurting theusofa -- but i am surprized at how well theusofa iz going, especially with gridlock etc.
    There iz of course no debt problem, koz there iz no such thing az a debt problem -- so kids are ok here.
    But kids shood fear krappynomix, eg austerity -- austerity today will affekt kids in lots of ways tomorrow.

    Rome iz similar. Rome died koz of taxes -- taxes and tax minimization and tax avoidance dominated commerce. Slaves didnt havta pay tax -- so rich people converted to slavery. So, Rome iz sort of similar to the usofa, but opposit.

    Burning. I dont think that burning or fire get a mention in the COTUS. But it might be in the same section az cars and planes.
    mac.
    Last edited by cushioncrawler; 02-27-2013 at 03:13 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    9,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Sid_Vicious View Post
    And it should endanger us. This sucks! Sounds like ducking on governmental responsibilities to me. Let the old timers out who are in prison for simple marijuanna. They are the oppressed and unjustly inprisoned!
    Should we pretend like everybody doesn't know that nine corner is lww?
    May God bless all of you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •