The Conscience of A Liberal
August 1, 20013
The N.Y. Times
Is economic/political commentary like writing detective stories? In some ways, I think, it is; certainly I have always taken to heart some passages in Raymond Chandlerís The Simple Art of Murder, especially the passage in which he distinguishes between the inherent importance of themes and the extent to which they are a good subject for writers:
Right now, if inherent importance were all that mattered, I wouldnít be writing about the effects of sprawl, or the Fed succession, or even, probably, about Chinaís brick-wall problem. I would instead be writing all the time about the looming chaos in U.S. governance.
Other things being equal, which they never are, a more powerful theme will provoke a more powerful performance. Yet some very dull books have been written about God, and some very fine ones about how to make a living and stay fairly honest.
In the short run the point is that Republican leaders are about to reap the whirlwind, because they havenít had the courage to tell the base that Obamacare is here to stay, that the sequester is in fact intolerable, and that in general they have at least for now lost the war over the shape of American society. As a result, weíre looking at many drama-filled months, with a high probability of government shutdowns and even debt defaults.
Over the longer run the point is that one of Americaís two major political parties has basically gone off the deep end; policy content aside, a sane party doesnít hold dozens of votes declaring its intention to repeal a law that everyone knows will stay on the books regardless. And since that party continues to hold substantial blocking power, we are looking at a country thatís increasingly ungovernable.
The trouble is that itís hard to give this issue anything like the amount of coverage it deserves on substantive grounds without repeating oneself. So I do try to mix it up. But neither you nor I should forget that the madness of the GOP is the central issue of our time.