Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Senate Judiciary Backs Amendment to Overturn "Citizens United"

  1. #1
    Senior Member DiabloViejo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    13,807

    Senate Judiciary Backs Amendment to Overturn "Citizens United"

    The Senate Judiciary Committee Just Backed an Amendment to Overturn ‘Citizens United’

    It’s evident that constitutional amendments are introduced, but rarely ever approved. So what made lawmakers endorse a new proposed constitutional amendment to restore damage done to democracy and regulate financial contributions to influence elections?

    Nation of Change
    Sunday July 13, 2014
    http://www.nationofchange.org/senate...ted-1405269623





    Constitutional amendments are often proposed, but rarely advanced to the stage of serious debate. What moves any meaningful amendment from mere paperwork to serious consideration is the popular will of the great mass of Americans. And the popular will of the great mass of Americans have been abundantly clear since the United States Supreme Court struck down barriers to corporate control of democracy with its 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling.

    Sixteen American states and roughly 600 communities have formally told Congress that the Constitution must be amended to make it clear that corporations are not people, money is not speech and citizens and their elected representatives have a right to organize elections that are defined by votes rather than dollars.

    Once dismissed even by many reformers as an appropriate yet impossible initiative, the movement for a “Money Out/Voters In” amendment to the Constitution has grown so strong — and been proven to be so necessary — that it has now achieved what most organizers of amendment movements only imagine.

    On Thursday, the US Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10-8 to endorse an amendment that would undo the damage done to democracy by a series of High Court decisions — and to restore reasonable limits on financial contributions and expenditures intended to influence elections.

    Read the rest of the article here: http://www.nationofchange.org/senate...ted-1405269623
    Last edited by DiabloViejo; 07-13-2014 at 03:12 PM.
    If there is a dangerous forum ... that's the one. -- LWW (referring to BD NPR)

    First off ... nothing will stop ass killings entirely. -- LWW (AKA Vladimir Ulyanov, AKA WV Slim, AKA MrsLWW, .....)

    Where did there CEO go yo work at loser? -- LWW (Demonstrating his masterful command of the English language while masquerading as his wife Vladimir.)


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    20,918
    Bravo! Go Democrats!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •