I've been in various tip experiments and know people who have been in them as well, and it seems to me that these trial periods are almost never of any duration. Can a fair analysis of a tip be made in weeks of play,,,,I'm talking about those tips which give no unpleasant performance, better yet they produce well. If a producing tip is cut off in it's very early life, can it really be said that we now know that it is, or is not the tip we should decide to use as our regular tip? If a tip is making most of your balls and feels good, when should you call the experiment truly over? If a new experiment happens to cause replacement of a new, working tip, hasn't it just quashed some possible valuable, future knowledge about that performing tip you just whacked off???sid


Reply With Quote